Reengineering Life

The Next Gene-Edited Babies Could Be Free of Sickle Cell or Muscular Dystrophy

But the technology isn’t reliable enough yet, says a global committee

Emily Mullin
Future Human
Published in
5 min readSep 8, 2020

--

Scientist He Jiankui at the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing in Hong Kong on November 28, 2018. Photo source: Anthony Wallace/Getty Images

Reengineering Life is a series from OneZero about the astonishing ways genetic technology is changing humanity and the world around us.

The advent of CRISPR in recent years has introduced the prospect of using gene editing not only to treat disease but to prevent it altogether. By tweaking the genes of a human embryo, it would be possible to make the resulting baby — and generations to come — free of certain inherited diseases.

For now though, the technology is not yet mature enough to do so safely, according to an international commission of scientists and ethicists in a much-anticipated new report. They conclude that edited human embryos should not be used to create a pregnancy until scientists can establish that precise genetic edits can be made reliably without introducing unintended changes.

Even then, the authors say gene editing in embryos should only happen in very specific and limited circumstances. If a nation does allow “heritable human genome editing,” its initial uses should be limited to the prevention of serious diseases caused by a mutation in a…

--

--

Future Human
Future Human

Published in Future Human

Future Human was science publication from Medium about the survival of our species. Currently inactive and not taking submissions.

Emily Mullin
Emily Mullin

Written by Emily Mullin

Former staff writer at Medium, where I covered biotech, genetics, and Covid-19 for OneZero, Future Human, Elemental, and the Coronavirus Blog.

Responses (2)